Power transmission

What Happened to Pete Jackson Gear Drives? A Maintenance Story Involving Cone Drive, Thrust Bearings, and an Induction Motor

Posted on 2026-08-19 by Jane Smith

At 6:47 on a Tuesday night in March 2025, I typed the search that made my supervisor do a double take:

what happened to pete jackson gear drives?

It was not a history question. It was a maintenance emergency with a deadline attached.

I handle gearbox and motor orders for a small industrial production facility. I've been doing it for seven years, and I've made my share of mistakes. Eleven significant ones, by my own count, totaling roughly $26,000 in wasted budget. I now keep a checklist. This story is the reason the checklist exists.

The line in question was an old conveyor that carried packed goods to a palletizing station. It used a right-angle gear drive with no nameplate. The stamped code said PJ-GD-0281. The senior mechanics called it a Pete Jackson drive. Nobody could tell me what Pete Jackson was. The drive just ran. Until it stopped.

First symptom: the motor hummed, but the shaft did not turn. The motor housing was hot. The line had to be running by 6 AM, so I made the obvious call: replace the induction motor. I knew I should check the gear drive first, but I thought, 'What are the odds the mechanical side is also bad?'

Well, the odds caught up with me.

The new induction motor ran for 17 minutes. Then it stopped. Then it filled the bay with the smell of overheated varnish. A new motor failed because the load it was driving was locked up. The motor was fine. The reducer was not. Worse than expected.

After we pulled the drive apart, we found why. The worm shaft and bronze gear looked okay at first glance. The failure was inside: a scored output thrust bearing. The roller retainer was in three pieces. Thrust bearings in a right-angle reducer have one job: hold the shaft in place under axial load. When one lets go, the gear set shifts and the motor sees a mechanical short circuit. (This is the point where my maintenance supervisor said, 'See? Not the motor.')

Now we had a second problem. There was no original vendor. The phone number on the old purchase order was a dead line. The phrase what happened to pete jackson gear drives returned twenty-year-old forum threads, a few hot rod listings, and a lot of opinions. Not one official service center.

I do not mean to say the old Pete Jackson drive was a bad piece of equipment. It lasted longer than anyone in that plant could remember. But it gave us no data. We had no bearing rating, no part number, no torque limit. When a part failed, we had to guess. That guess cost us an induction motor and 14 hours of downtime.

As of March 2025, I still have not found a definitive answer to the Pete Jackson question. Maybe the brand was absorbed into something bigger. Maybe the owner retired. The online trail went cold. What I found instead was a replacement.

Why I Called Cone Drive Operations Inc.

A friend at another plant said their rail transfer system used Cone Drive Operations Inc. reducers. I called them. The person who answered asked three questions: input speed, running hours, and whether the output shaft carried axial load. That last question stopped me. Nobody else had asked that. It was exactly the thrust bearing issue we had just seen.

I sent photos of the old baseplate, the motor coupling, and the failed bearing. The engineer came back with a drawing that showed a cone-drive double-enveloping worm reducer with a specified thrust bearing rating. That was the moment I stopped comparing vendors.

The Cost Decision I Did Not Want to Make

Repairing the old unit would have saved about $4,800. The upside was obvious. The risk was another unplanned stop with the same unknown bearing rating. I kept asking myself: is $4,800 worth potentially losing an entire customer order?

Calculated worst case: a second failure would cost $9,000 in lost production plus a rush rebuild. Best case: the repair held for ten years. The expected value said repair, because most old gear drives can be rebuilt. But the downside felt catastrophic. I have been the person who explains why production is down twice in one week. I did not want to be that person again.

We had 18 hours to decide before the next scheduled line run. Normally I'd get three quotes and have a standards meeting. That was not possible. I made the call on limited criteria: Cone Drive was the only vendor that asked about thrust load. If they ask about the part that failed last, they probably know the rest.

When the quote was signed, the shipping confirmation showed a facility at 3 Pine Cone Drive, Palm Coast. I typed '3 pine cone drive palm coast' into maps before sending anything. Address errors on a $9,000 gearbox are not an adventure I want to repeat.

The Replacement and What I Learned

The new reducer arrived two days later. We bolted it to a NEMA Premium efficiency induction motor from our local distributor, and the old mount required only two new holes. Not ideal, but workable. Installation took four hours.

I still order spare induction motors for our pumps, but this reducer has its own failure modes. Now both have documentation.

The digital side surprised me. Cone Drive's configuration tool gave us a PDF with the gearbox model, the lubricant, the thrust bearing part number, and the torques at both input and output. That document is now taped inside the electrical cabinet. It made the next maintenance check much faster. Efficiency like that is not just a convenience. It is a competitive edge.

I still believe old-school repairs have value. If you can document the parts, rebuild it. But if the original data is gone, the repair is a gamble. I do not see that as nostalgia. I see it as risk management.

So What Happened to Pete Jackson Gear Drives?

I do not have an official answer. The name disappeared from my search results around a 2011 forum post, as far as I could tell. What I know for sure is that we needed a working drive, and the search ended at Cone Drive Operations Inc. The question got us there; the answer that mattered was a replacement with real numbers.

If your machine has an old reducer and you do not know its thrust bearing rating, find out before the motor starts failing. And if you search for what happened to pete jackson gear drives and end up at a dead end, call Cone Drive Operations Inc. and ask for thrust bearing data. Asking that simple question can save you an induction motor, a weekend, and a long conversation with your supervisor.

Checklist for the next time:

  • Take a photo of the nameplate before the unit is covered in grease.
  • Ask every gearbox vendor for the thrust bearing rating in writing.
  • Check the reducer output for axial play before changing a motor.
  • If the brand is gone, move on. The application is still there. Get a replacement with data.
Jane Smith

Jane Smith

I’m Jane Smith, a senior content writer with over 15 years of experience in the packaging and printing industry. I specialize in writing about the latest trends, technologies, and best practices in packaging design, sustainability, and printing techniques. My goal is to help businesses understand complex printing processes and design solutions that enhance both product packaging and brand visibility.

Leave a technical comment